Skip to main content

Ask Zandar


 
You know, until doing this blog, I wasn't aware of just how many electronic board games there actually were, but it seems they were once quite common. It's kind of a neat idea, adds something to what could otherwise be a dull experience, but I've also noticed a lot of these fall into that grey area of "is it really a board game or is it a toy with a board?". Ask Zandar seems to be one of those. But look at the box. It just oozes that same kind of otherwordly mystique that Jumanji does. Something magical, ethereal, something that, perhaps, we aren't meant to be engaging with but can't help ourselves either. The font, the painting, the overall aesthetic design. It's a thing of beauty.

Released in 1992, with a once again uncredited designer (getting real sick of that being a regularly recurring thing) for up to 4 players with a runtime of 30 minutes, Board Game Geek describes the gameplay as such:

On their turn, each player draws a question card, reads it out loud, guesses whether Zandar will answer affirmatively or negatively, waves their hand over the top of Zandar's globe (to trigger a light sensor), and listens to his answer. If they guessed correctly, they can either take a gem of their color from the pile and put it in front of them or onto the game board. If they guess incorrectly, they must return one. The other players can make a "side bet" during their turn and guess at Zandar's answer. If they are right, they get a gem of their color. If they are wrong, they must return one. The first player to place all six of their gems onto the game board wins and gets to have their fortune read by Zandar.

A pretty damn simple concept, if you ask me. In all honesty, perhaps a bit TOO simple. I kind of wish there was a bit more complexity to it, but really, what more could there be? After all, how do you really make a game out of "ask the mysterious all knowing tiny man trapped in the orb"? It kind of has to be simple because, quite frankly, there isn't anything else it COULD be. But that isn't inherently a bad thing. I mean, simplicity is often overlooked in favor of complexity, and there's a certain beauty to simplicity. It allows you to just have a good time without too much effort or complications. So let's take a closer look at the pieces the game comes with.

If I'm being extremely honest, this thing is pretty as hell. The colors alone make it pop so much, that blueish-purple mixture and of course the red base of Zandar's orb matches well with everything. It's just very lovely to look at. There's nothing worse to me than a board game that's an eyesore. You're gonna spend alot of time looking at this thing, so it better be visually appealing, and thankfully that's the case here.
 
But, as with many of these electronic board games, the overall actual gameplay leaves quite a bit to be desired. Perhaps even moreso here than say a game such as "Electronic Mall Madness" because while that comes with an entire set to move across, this is really just you and your friends asking a tiny wizard trapped in a transparent globe questions. It's extremely straight forward, with not much challenge or even much strategy to be had in how to succeed because, far as I can tell, it's about as accurate as RNG. But there's still some fun to be had, in spite of its simplicity. As I said, simplicity has never been an automatic disqualification. So on a scale of 1 to 10 on the fun factor, I'd probably give Zandar a 4 or a light 5. Granted I've never played it, but since when have internet writers ever let reality get in their way? But design wise? This thing is a 10. No question.
 
But perhaps there's more to gleam from this than we've seen just yet! Maybe we should take a chance to look at the back of the box as well. See what other information the supposedly all knowing Zandar can provide us mere mortals with.


For starters, he's pointing at the orb in his hand like a Wojack, which doesn't leave me much hope for intelligent answers, but we'll see. Also, apparently Zandar has the ability to control the weather and flicker lights? Those are pretty impressive powers for someone stuck in a glass ball. Also, I can't help but notice how generic and vague Zandar's answers are implied to be. This is the problem with "mind readers" or "fortune tellers" to begin with. Listen, I'm all for believing in the mystic and supernatural, I've got nothing if not an open mind, but there's this thing people do called Cold Reading where they look at a person and take educated guesses. For instance, if someone is say, around 40 or so, then the person asking the questions will likely tell them, "Your parents miss you" because there's a high likelihood that, at that age, those persons parents - or at the very least one of them - has died. It's emotional manipulation at its finest, an art form, really.

I just don't trust people who don't give in depth answers. If I ask if I'm going to win the lottery, don't tell me yes. Tell me when, tell me where to buy the ticket, and what numbers to pick. If I ask if I'm going to die, tell me when, where and how. I don't want vagueness. I want specificity. Goddammit Zandar, you're a hack!

All jokes aside, this is a pretty neat little game. It's got a great aesthetic, it's got good design, it's got nice color, and it's a cool idea even if its a bit...childish. I mean, I get that board games - especially from this period of time - favored heavily towards a child audience, but come on. You're really gonna ask if you're going to get the lead in the school play and not something a bit more interesting? Children are smarter and more empathetic than we often give them credit for. How about asking Zandar if your father will eventually stop beating your mother, and if he says "no", then you take Zandar's glass prison and bash your fathers head in with it.

Ironically, he'd never see it coming.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Dogfight

Dogfight is, right off the bat, presented by absolutely killer artwork. But it's also presented by a rather honest combination of words, "American Heritage". It's true, the only thing more American than fighting in a war is starting a war. It's our national past time. Baseball? Nah, fuck Baseball. War is what we here in the USofA strive for. Like Screamin' Eagles, we have yet another plane fight board game, but unlike Screamin' Eagles this one is based in World War 1 and not whenever the hell Screamin' Eagles is supposedly based. I'm gonna go ahead and say in the 80s, and the Cold War, just to make it more interesting. Released in 1962 by Milton-Bradley under their American Heritage line of the Command Decision series of board games, with art by Charles H. Hubbell, it's a 45 minute game that can have up to 4 players and, much like Screamin' Eagles two decades later, also utilizes cards because, well, it's a board game and you kind of ne...
1 comment
Read more

Conspiracy

What if I were to tell you that Conspiracy doesn't exist? That, in fact, Milton Bradley has denied it ever existing, and that those who have looked into the game, trying to determine its legitimacy, have suddenly and mysteriously gone missing. Would you believe me? Of course not, because that's ridiculous. But that's what conspiracies are, absolutely ridiculous things that nobody should believe. Then again, there was a period of time where conspiracies were much more fun. When they were more along the lines of "I think there's a giant sea monster living in a lake and the government is hiding its existence because they're afraid of mass public reaction" and less along the lines of "the government is inserting chips into our children to brainwash them into the queer agenda." One is plausible, one is ridiculous. And, in case you for some reason had to ask, the plausible one is the sea monster. I figured that went without clarification, but in thes...
Post a Comment
Read more

Electronic Mall Madness

Boy, growing up in the 80s/90s, as I did, if you asked where girls lived, you'd often get the response, "The mall!" because people just thought teenage girls lived and died at the mall. And while I did visit the mall a lot as an adolescent, I assure you it wasn't to take advantage of THESE GREAT LOW PRICED DEALS! It was more to either buy a book now and then, or escape my family, and often much more the second than the first. It wasn't about social interaction or spending money, it was about having the chance to actually get out of the house and away from the people who constantly wanted to hurt me. So to make a board game based on a mall, something that, these days, seems to sort of be in its death throes, is a pretty great concept that I'm all for. Even as much of a stereotype as "girls love the mall" might have become, let me tell you, as someone who was once a teenage girl, it's 100% true. See a stereotype is a stereotype often because they...
Post a Comment
Read more