Skip to main content

Chutes & Ladders

Chutes & Ladders, Snakes & Ladders, Eels & Escalators, whatever you wanna call it, is one of those few board games that felt old when I was a kid. While most board games are relatively ancient, they at least never felt that way, or at least were modernized often enough, given a slightly fresher coat of paint, to appeal to younger audiences. But Chutes & Ladders never did, or if it did it certainly didn't work because nobody I know has ever played this game. It's almost as fake as Jumanji in its existence. One we've only heard whispered about but never witnessed ourselves. And yet, it is a real board game (also like Jumanji, amazingly; thanks marketing!) that you can go buy right now at your local superstore, on the shelf next to - frankly - more deserving games, like literally any of the ones I've talked about on here thusfar.

Turns out my intuition about Chutes & Ladders being ancient was not actually all that far off.

Chutes & Ladders (whose real name was Snakes & Ladders) was originally known as Moksha Patam, an ancient Indian board game. It's the same exact game, essentially, just not as dumb looking. If anything, Moksha Patam was way more visually intriguing than what the board morphed into. According to Wikipedia, "the historic version had its roots in morality lessons, on which a players progression on a board represented a life journey complicated by virtues, visually seen as the ladders, and vices, visually seen as the snakes." The game has been made under a thousand other titles, including Bible Ups & Downs, and finally in 1943, Milton Bradley published Chutes & Ladders.

The overall history of this thing is truly fascinating, but it's also incredibly long, so I won't go over everything here beyond what I've already covered, but I do highly recommend that you read up on it because it's a very, very interesting read! I've linked the history section of the wiki right here for your convenience. So, when Bradley released their version, they replaced the snakes with a playground setting, because children disliked snakes, because children are dumb and have no concept of what's cool. They kept the overall morality design, with being at the top of the ladder being a good thing, and at the bottom (down a chute, essentially) shows the children showing the consequences of poor decisions.

FUN FACT. Canada has multiple versions, but the best has to be the one that replaces snakes with Toboggan runs.

 Honestly, the concept of the morality base is fascinating, but also somewhat unnerving, that we're disguising a board game as a way to scare children into behaving. Board games are supposed to be fun! Yet, here we are, utilizing them as just another tool to try and control children into behaving in a way we deem appropriate. As for arguing about the board itself, I think we can all agree that while Chutes & Ladders is cute and all, it's super bland and straight forward, and really we should all just bring back the Moksha Patam board, because that thing is so much more visually intriguing, and aesthetically interesting than anything else. Sure, the one with the playground set and the cute children is adorable and all, and design wise isn't terrible even if it is fairly uninspired, but snakes? Who, besides Indiana Jones, doesn't like snakes?!

I'm honestly willing to start a petition of some kind to attempt to convince Milton Bradley to re-release the game under the Moksha Patam name and with the original board design. What with the whole outcry against cultural appropriation concept these days, I think we could manage to make it happen. I think it's time to recognize the roots of where it came from, and celebrate how goddamned cool it is, because it really deserves it. Even as a little girl, I never knew anyone who played Chutes & Ladders, despite being the right age group for it, so I can't say I have many, if any, fond memories of it. I don't even know anyone who ever played it when I was that age, once again, despite them being the right target age for it. It's just always sort of being one of those games that's been there, but nobody plays.

But if Moksha Patam was re-released as it once was, I think it might get people interested again. My generation loves cultural differences and snakes, so it's right up our alley. Plus, maybe it'll finally help us come to terms with accepting all the poor choices we've made that have led us to the miserable lives we currently lead. 

Or maybe that's just me. 

Probably just me.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Gunfight At O.K. Corral

Gunfight at O.K. Corral is a board game in which a pair of dueling children pit their monstrous sized personal Cowboys against one another in a fight to the death. Okay, not really, but that would be so much better than what it actually is, wouldn't it? Kaiju Cowboys? Maybe it's just me who find that amusing. Either way, Gunfight is similar to the previous game featured here, "Crossfire", in that it almost boils down to essentially the same overall concept of just shooting things at whoever is on the other side of the board. Published by Ideal in 1973, I can find no information on either the designer or the artist, which kind of leaves us in a tough spot, because now I don't have anyones career to pick through for amusement, so let's talk about the game itself, shall we? Frankly, I think if you're having a gunfight, then not everything is okay at this corral. The description of this game is as follows: This is a children's dexterity game where players ...

Electronic Enchanted Palace

  You know, I'm starting to realize that there was a trend of making girly games with the word "electronic" in front of their titles for a while. "Electronic Dream Phone" , "Electronic Mall Madness" , and now "Electronic Enchanted Palace". Sadly, this installment in the electronic girly interest board game isn't by Michael Gray. And, like the other two, or at least like Dream Phone moreso than Mall Madness, it barely registers as a board game because, well, it really straddles that fine line between board game and convoluted toy. So how's this game work? Well, according to our good friends over at Board Game Geek (I don't know if we're actually good friends, we've never really hung out, but I like to think we'd get along well), they state the throughline of the game is as follows: "Once upon a time in a land far away, an Evil Witch captured a magical palace and locked its Good Queen in the tower! Can you and your...

Electronic Dream Phone

Electronic Dream Phone, I'm sad to report, is not actually a dating teleservice for Freddy Kreuger, but instead another game catered primarily to teenage girls, who's only interests, according to marketing "experts" are malls and telephones. The game, released in 1991, is yet another that straddles the line between convoluted toy and proper board game, because while, yes, it does contain a board, the board isn't exactly your main focus here. Designed by Michael Gray (who, coincidentally enough, also designed Electronic Mall Madness) and published most famously by Hasbro, Dream Phone actually comes with a handful of alternate names, most of them foreign, and some funny enough to include right here. These include Boyfriend Phone, Téléphone Secret, and Droomtelefoon, which is just fun to say. The runtime for this game is apparently 20 minutes, which seems about right, considering the basis behind the game, as it were, is described by Board Game Geek as such: ...