Skip to main content

Trouble

Trouble is one of the oldest board game memories that I have.

I don't have a lot of good memories growing up, but, before my mother remarried, we did spend a lot of time together in relatively good ways and one of those ways was playing Trouble. I think we went to Toys R Us and decided which board game to pick out, and I think we settled on Trouble because we often felt like we were so close to being in trouble ourselves all the time. It really just seemed very appropriate at the time.

Launching in 1965 and originally made by Kohner Brothers for Irwin Toys (but later, like everything else, falling under Milton Bradley's enormous amazing technicolor umbrella), Trouble is - much like Candy Land - an extremely simple game. You simply need to move the pieces around the board while rolling your dice in the pop-o-matic, a concept that honestly I'm surprised I've only ever seen in Trouble, as it's extremely easy to lose dice and cheat with dice. With the pop-o-matic device, it keeps the die in the game board, makes it so it can't be toyed with, and on the whole makes things fair for everyone. Now perhaps it's not been used in anything else because it's copyrighted, I don't know, but I think it's one of the single most brilliant design choices in the history of board games, myself.

The board design, and overall design I suppose, is also fairly decent. It's a very simple board, but its bursting with colors corresponding to each of the 4 player colors, and the little peg/hole design choice is really cool. Again, making it easy to not have your pieces easily misplaced. Trouble, more than anything, seemed very interest in simplistic yet logistically sound game design. I can approve of that. My favorite fun fact about Trouble, however, is that in the UK it's known as "Frustration", which really is hilarious and oddly appropriate because, honestly, isn't trouble just extremely frustrating? I'd say so. It also neatly ties into the UK's inability to sound rude.

There's actually not a whole lot of interesting history to talk about in regards to the game itself, quite frankly. So  with that in mind, I'll just say that Trouble is definitely a classic and understandably so, because, much like Candy Land, it's simple design and play style is so simple that even a 4 year old could be involved, making it an all ages game and thus perfect for families to play together. And while it's not a super interesting board, visually, unlike Candy Land or (especially Pay Day), it's still aesthetically visually pleasing and easy to look at and comprehend.

So, if you're ever in the mood to play a game, might I suggest Trouble, a game that, with as easy as it is to understand, you should have no trouble getting the hang of.

...sorry. That was terrible.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Dogfight

Dogfight is, right off the bat, presented by absolutely killer artwork. But it's also presented by a rather honest combination of words, "American Heritage". It's true, the only thing more American than fighting in a war is starting a war. It's our national past time. Baseball? Nah, fuck Baseball. War is what we here in the USofA strive for. Like Screamin' Eagles, we have yet another plane fight board game, but unlike Screamin' Eagles this one is based in World War 1 and not whenever the hell Screamin' Eagles is supposedly based. I'm gonna go ahead and say in the 80s, and the Cold War, just to make it more interesting. Released in 1962 by Milton-Bradley under their American Heritage line of the Command Decision series of board games, with art by Charles H. Hubbell, it's a 45 minute game that can have up to 4 players and, much like Screamin' Eagles two decades later, also utilizes cards because, well, it's a board game and you kind of ne

Conspiracy

What if I were to tell you that Conspiracy doesn't exist? That, in fact, Milton Bradley has denied it ever existing, and that those who have looked into the game, trying to determine its legitimacy, have suddenly and mysteriously gone missing. Would you believe me? Of course not, because that's ridiculous. But that's what conspiracies are, absolutely ridiculous things that nobody should believe. Then again, there was a period of time where conspiracies were much more fun. When they were more along the lines of "I think there's a giant sea monster living in a lake and the government is hiding its existence because they're afraid of mass public reaction" and less along the lines of "the government is inserting chips into our children to brainwash them into the queer agenda." One is plausible, one is ridiculous. And, in case you for some reason had to ask, the plausible one is the sea monster. I figured that went without clarification, but in thes

Electronic Mall Madness

Boy, growing up in the 80s/90s, as I did, if you asked where girls lived, you'd often get the response, "The mall!" because people just thought teenage girls lived and died at the mall. And while I did visit the mall a lot as an adolescent, I assure you it wasn't to take advantage of THESE GREAT LOW PRICED DEALS! It was more to either buy a book now and then, or escape my family, and often much more the second than the first. It wasn't about social interaction or spending money, it was about having the chance to actually get out of the house and away from the people who constantly wanted to hurt me. So to make a board game based on a mall, something that, these days, seems to sort of be in its death throes, is a pretty great concept that I'm all for. Even as much of a stereotype as "girls love the mall" might have become, let me tell you, as someone who was once a teenage girl, it's 100% true. See a stereotype is a stereotype often because they&#